Wow, its fun to get a lot of comments :) a word of explanation:
I think some of you misread the proposed question in my last post thinking that I wanted your commentary on the practice of academic figure drawing instead of what I intended. I wondered "would you be offended to have the option to view God's creation in a non-sexual, but beautiful way, expressed artistically through another of God's creations?"
Not to offend, but to clear the air, I don't care about your opinions on the practice of creating the art, merely the viewing of said art. I do understand your aversion to the human body, being raised in a very strict Utah society, and appreciate knowing that you would not like to view certain subject matter in art. I understand, and in respect to those opinions would like to forewarn you to not check my art blog, because I will be posting academic studies as they come.
And also, I would like to point out that it would be helpful for some to become educated on certain issues BEFORE reading too much into things. Brigham Young sent three missionaries to the Jullian academy to expressly study the human figure in the nude form, in order to hone artistic proficiency so that they could use that knowledge later in life to benefit the church in temple murals, etc. These missionaries would even send home nude figure drawings to be framed and preserved. SUU now has some of these drawings in their personal collection. One of which is a full nude, seated figure, and I have to say, it is an impeccable drawing, and a large reason I decided to pursue academic figuration.
Likewise if someone argues that artists shouldn't study the nude human figure because of some underlying sexual evil, they are in effect, also suggesting that neither should doctors including gynecologists, urologists, or obstetricians. (So I guess in your logic, that exploits Brigham Young and some of our current general authorities as double standard holding frauds. Forgive me, but I in no way share your logic.)
And for those of you who don't know, there's a great site called lds.org :) you can follow this link to read more about the Mormon "nudie" missionaries.
http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&locale=0&sourceId=bb16d7630a27b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&hideNav=1
P.S. by definition, Pornography is depicting or describing the human body or sexual conduct in a way that arouses sexual feelings. In essence, sexually titillating. If you are getting kicks out of academic art, I am concerned about you.
5 comments:
Rob,
To not comment would be obvious because I comment on everything you post.
So this is me commenting. . . but not commenting--to preserve our relationship.
Lots of love, as always.
Jami
Bravo Rob
I'm giggling, but trying not to laugh out loud at the power of a simple blog question - I think I'll try it on my blog, what kind of controversy should we explore today?
love you!
ho ho - one more, thanks for the link. Interesting article and some beautiful images, I loved "The Harvest" and I wonder if it's the one referred to at the last conference.
Also - did you know if you want to make a link prettier on your blog you just type the word you want (like "click here" or something) and then click the chain button above your post (while you're editing the post) . . . it looks like, get this, a link :) Then you can type in the url and instead of a big ugly url on your blog you have an easy does it link. No copy and pasting for your readers and much more aesthetic (thought you'd like that). Now that I've taught you something you probably already knew I think I'll sign off, mission accomplished ;)
Rob, did you delete my comment? I've very curious why since you were the one to bring up the libido thing! :)
Post a Comment